Nobody really knows what gravity is.
It is generally confused with « pesanteur » and gravitational attraction.
The early scholars who studied it thought that it was a force holding together all the objects of space. For them, this space was that of our galaxy. For Newton, too, in the 17th century, who added that it made apples fall from trees and turn planets around stars. Two centuries later, Einstein took up the problem and presented his so-called theory of relativity, with difficult mathematics, based on false values.
With the Électronime, we examine the whole problem differently.
For the moment, we define gravity as the force that might be needed to regulate the entropy of space and all systems that are deified in this space.
Gravity and all the problems of materials and objects in space, are to be seen at 3 levels.
1) The space of the ether, consisting solely of vibrating electrons that create and fill it completely, without leaving a gap between them.
The electrons are all alike and vibrate in exactly the same way. They should all behave in the same way, but some of them bind randomly and the entire system becomes very complicated.
In this immense, probably limitless, ether, the entropy, existing in all systems, is maintained at a maximum level by permanent and immediate entropiation, realized by the vibrations of the electrons which move randomly with respect to each other.
Sometimes a few bind themselves, randomly. They form compounds. These are defects, relatively unimportant for the whole ether. They form stars, their atoms and clusters of galaxies that we perceive immense with our estimates and human measurements.
The entropisation does not change, because the defects are created with the free electrons of the ether and they remain participants of the ether, exist completely in the defects themselves. When regulating entropy, all electrons are concerned even those that exist in the defects.
The defects themselves can be displaced by the « narural » entropiation of space. Huge clusters of galaxies can be moved relative to others, without rules and without any link between them.
This phenomenon explains why, in the 1920s, the observation of these relative displacements of galaxies, and their armas, led to the Hubble constant which was not maintained because its value changed in permanence without reason or rule.
And it could now explain the apparent misunderstood « inflation » of space.
During the creation of electron compounds, rays are created which seem to transport, all around an event, to the end of the space, – the etherst itself or a well delimited zone -, a matter extra that does not exist, like the huge wave of a tsunami all over the ocean. (Chapter IV)
These rays can create wherever they go, compounds similar to those who formed them. Thus, we, « sighted » beings, or not, on Earth, receive at a very precise frequency small compounds, which can act on matter near or more than 10 or 15 billion light-years. We use them for light, images, radio waves, or photosynthesis.
The entropy of the ether remains easily at its maximum level without ever any elemental attraction, one by the other.
Note. Before passing to the level of the « defects » of the ether, it is necessary to eliminate the problem of « information » incomprehensible in the material universe.
Despite the particular mode of movement of the rays, they « transport » only compounds of electrons, never « information », that neither person nor nothing, would be able to create and one to use in the space and his objects.
How and why would « information » be produced and recorded in black holes or elsewhere?
2) We now consider in the space area of a star and all structures related to it, what we call a « defect » in the previous paragraph. For example, we take the super cluster Laniakea in which is our galaxy, the Milky Way. It has no direct link with other similar structures. Its area in the ether is huge for us (160 Mpc, = 520 million light-years in diameter), about 4% of the observable part of space.
All the objects that constitute it are created from the free electrons of the ether, displaced by their random bonds and the rays of the quantum effect.
The permanent entropisation of the ether, including the whole Laniakea area, prevents local accumulations of compounds and maintains maximum entropy everywhere.
But everything is extremely complicated and many phenomena have never been explained.
In the super cluster, compounds and all objects are always surrounded by an atmosphere that we explain in Chapter III of the test.
All objects are contained and including other objects or structures that are systems with entropy related to the nature of its components.
The displacements of the compounds, small or large obets and their accretion, which form the stars, have never been explained. Everything depends on the phenomena that accompany the bonds of the electrons:
– Intervention of the entropy of the ether,
– « Negative » movements,
– Creation of rays with quantum effect and possibly very far action leading to particular and small compounds, even if the real action is a series of very limited movements.
– Training more or less important according to the environment and the possible action of absorbed rays and therefore renewal of all operations.
The whole system remains free and modifications can always be reproduced in the systems of small to large objects. Some are due to the entropy that can not break composing but regroup, sometimes changing the shape of the structures.
Again, we did not find any gravitational attraction.
3) At the level of our planet, there is « a gravity » that seems to attract towards the central part of the Earth, all the objects of the system « earth ».
On Earth, all the phenomenon could be a result of what we explain in the previous paragraph. The objects of the Earth’s atmosphere would not be attracted by a force of attraction, but dragged towards the center of the Earth by the « natural » or entropic displacement of particles and compounds « meeting » compounds at a certain level rather high thermal agitation, constantly increasing.
This apparent force is not attractive, but we can continue to call it gravity.
This conclusion helps us to understand many phenomena still poorly or hardly explained. We quote some of them below, knowing that they require a lot of explanations:
– Magnetism, according to the study of Australian physicists,
– Behavior of compasses,
– Magnetic field of the Earth,
-Apparent electromagnetic field,
– Importance of magnism, (Chapter III)
– Orbits of planets around stars …
Despite all the research for more than four centuries, no gravitational attraction has been explained.
It is very difficult to say that gravity, as we know it on earth, is not attractive.
But this seems the only conclusion to our study.
© Philippe Dardel, December 2017